Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareJohn West Salmon In Springwater 200g vs PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 185g

John West Salmon In Springwater 200g vs PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 185g

Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 185g has less sugar (0.1 vs 1), less sodium (190 vs 303), less saturated fat (0.2 vs 0.5) than John West Salmon In Springwater 200g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

John West Salmon In Springwater 200g
John West Salmon In Springwater 200gJohn West
vs
PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 185g
PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 185gPORTVIEW
monounsaturated (higher)
0.5 vs 0.1 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
0.9 vs 0.2 g
Energy (lower)
431 vs 451 kJ
Protein (higher)
23.9 vs 22.4 g
Fat, total (lower)
0.6 vs 1.9 g
saturated (lower)
0.2 vs 0.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.2 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
190 vs 303 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueJohn WestPORTVIEW
Energy451 kJ (108 Cal)431 kJ (103 Cal)
Protein22.4 g23.9 g
Fat, total1.9 g0.6 g
- saturated0.5 g0.2 g
- monounsaturated0.5 g0.1 g
- polyunsaturated0.9 g0.2 g
- trans0.1 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate1 g0.2 g
- sugars1 g0.1 g
Sodium303 mg190 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

John West: Salmon (*fish*) (65%), springwater, salt.
PORTVIEW: see pack
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed