Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareBrunswick Original Kipper 100g vs Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170g

Brunswick Original Kipper 100g vs Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170g

Per 100 g, Brunswick Original Kipper 100g has less sugar (0 vs 1.2), less sodium (377 vs 590), more protein (18.5 vs 12.5) than Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Brunswick Original Kipper 100g
Brunswick Original Kipper 100gBrunswick
vs
Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170g
Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170gSirena
Protein (higher)
18.5 vs 12.5 g
monounsaturated (higher)
6.5 vs 3 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0 vs 8.8 g
sugars (lower)
0 vs 1.2 g
Sodium (lower)
377 vs 590 mg
Fat, total (lower)
9.8 vs 12.5 g
saturated (lower)
1.3 vs 2.9 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
4.3 vs 2.8 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueBrunswickSirena
Energy777 kJ (186 Cal)765 kJ (183 Cal)
Protein18.5 g12.5 g
Fat, total12.5 g9.8 g
- saturated2.9 g1.3 g
- monounsaturated6.5 g3 g
- polyunsaturated2.8 g4.3 g
- trans0 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate0 g8.8 g
- sugars0 g1.2 g
Dietary fibre-4.5 g
Sodium377 mg590 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

Brunswick: see pack
Sirena: POLE AND LINE CAUGHT YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (25%), SOYBEAN (15%), CHICKPEA (13%), RED KIDNEY BEAN (12%), OIL (SUNFLOWER OIL AND EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL), BARLEY (
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed