Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › Brunswick Original Kipper 100g vs PORTVIEW Sriracha with Rice Tuna Bowl 190g
Brunswick Original Kipper 100g vs PORTVIEW Sriracha with Rice Tuna Bowl 190g
Per 100 g, Brunswick Original Kipper 100g has less sugar (0 vs 4.6), less sodium (377 vs 564), more protein (18.5 vs 5.6) than PORTVIEW Sriracha with Rice Tuna Bowl 190g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Brunswick Original Kipper 100g leads on
Energy (lower)
777 vs 799 kJ
Protein (higher)
18.5 vs 5.6 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0 vs 20 g
sugars (lower)
0 vs 4.6 g
Sodium (lower)
377 vs 564 mg
Fat, total (lower)
9.8 vs 12.5 g
saturated (lower)
1.5 vs 2.9 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Brunswick | PORTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 777 kJ (186 Cal) | 799 kJ (191 Cal) |
| Protein | 18.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Fat, total | 12.5 g | 9.8 g |
| - saturated | 2.9 g | 1.5 g |
| - monounsaturated | 6.5 g | - |
| - polyunsaturated | 2.8 g | - |
| - trans | 0 g | - |
| Carbohydrate | 0 g | 20 g |
| - sugars | 0 g | 4.6 g |
| Dietary fibre | - | 2.6 g |
| Sodium | 377 mg | 564 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
Brunswick: see pack
PORTVIEW: see pack