Cals › Canned meals › Compare › Ainsley Harriott Cous Cous Sundried Tomato & Garlic vs Kraft Easy Mac And Cheese Cheesy Chicken Pasta Macaroni Noodles
Ainsley Harriott Cous Cous Sundried Tomato & Garlic vs Kraft Easy Mac And Cheese Cheesy Chicken Pasta Macaroni Noodles
Per 100 g, Ainsley Harriott Cous Cous Sundried Tomato & Garlic has less sugar (2.6 vs 3.2), less saturated fat (0.4 vs 1.5), more protein (5.4 vs 4.4) than Kraft Easy Mac And Cheese Cheesy Chicken Pasta Macaroni Noodles.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Ainsley Harriott Cous Cous Sundried Tomato & GarlicAinsley Harriott
vs
Kraft Easy Mac And Cheese Cheesy Chicken Pasta Macaroni NoodlesKraft
Protein (higher)
5.4 vs 4.4 g
Fat, total (lower)
0.9 vs 2.9 g
saturated (lower)
0.4 vs 1.5 g
sugars (lower)
2.6 vs 3.2 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
24.3 vs 27 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Ainsley Harriott | Kraft |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 593 kJ (142 Cal) | 605 kJ (145 Cal) |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 4.4 g |
| Fat, total | 0.9 g | 2.9 g |
| - saturated | 0.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 27 g | 24.3 g |
| - sugars | 2.6 g | 3.2 g |
| Dietary fibre | 2.1 g | - |
| Sodium | 253 mg | 245 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each can
Ainsley Harriott: see pack
Kraft: see pack