Cals
CalsCanned beansCompareEdgell Edamame Beans Ready to Eat 125g x 4 pack vs Macro Organic Pinto Beans 420g

Edgell Edamame Beans Ready to Eat 125g x 4 pack vs Macro Organic Pinto Beans 420g

Per 100 g, Macro Organic Pinto Beans 420g has more legume (60% vs 56%), less sodium (8 vs 187), less saturated fat (0.2 vs 0.9) than Edgell Edamame Beans Ready to Eat 125g x 4 pack.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Edgell Edamame Beans Ready to Eat 125g x 4 pack
Edgell Edamame Beans Ready to Eat 125g x 4 pack56% legume
vs
Macro Organic Pinto Beans 420g
Macro Organic Pinto Beans 420g60% legume
Protein (higher)
10.1 vs 7 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
4.5 vs 13.4 g
Energy (lower)
430 vs 501 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
0.75 vs 6.1 g
saturated (lower)
0.2 vs 0.9 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
7.2 vs 3.4 g
Sodium (lower)
8 vs 187 mg
More legume
60% vs 56%

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueEdgellMacro
Energy501 kJ (120 Cal)430 kJ (103 Cal)
Protein10.1 g7 g
Fat, total6.1 g0.75 g
- saturated0.9 g0.2 g
Carbohydrate4.5 g13.4 g
- sugars1 g1 g
Dietary fibre3.4 g7.2 g
Sodium187 mg8 mg
Potassium-236 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each can

Edgell: Edamame beans (*soy*) (56%), water, salt, firming agent (509).
56% legume
Macro: Organic Pinto Beans (60%), Water
60% legume
Browsing Canned beans · rankings · finder · what changed