Coles Chocolate Fingers Biscuits vs Griffin's Choc Thins Biscuits 180g
Per 100 g, Coles Chocolate Fingers Biscuits has less sodium (220 vs 352), less saturated fat (13 vs 17.9), more protein (6.5 vs 4.7) than Griffin's Choc Thins Biscuits 180g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Coles Chocolate Fingers Biscuits leads on
Protein (higher)
6.5 vs 4.7 g
Fat, total (lower)
21.5 vs 23.8 g
saturated (lower)
13 vs 17.9 g
Sodium (lower)
220 vs 352 mg
Griffin's Choc Thins Biscuits 180g leads on
sugars (lower)
30 vs 37.4 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Coles | GRIFFIN'S |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 2050 kJ (490 Cal) | 2060 kJ (492 Cal) |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Fat, total | 21.5 g | 23.8 g |
| - saturated | 13 g | 17.9 g |
| - trans | 0.2 g | - |
| Carbohydrate | 65.8 g | 64 g |
| - sugars | 37.4 g | 30 g |
| Dietary fibre | 3.3 g | - |
| Sodium | 220 mg | 352 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each packet
Coles: see pack
GRIFFIN'S: see pack