Cals
CalsBiscuitsCompareColes Chocolate Biscuits Whirlz Honeycomb vs McVitie's Hobnobs Milk Chocolate 262g

Coles Chocolate Biscuits Whirlz Honeycomb vs McVitie's Hobnobs Milk Chocolate 262g

Per 100 g, McVitie's Hobnobs Milk Chocolate 262g has less sugar (32.3 vs 48.7), less saturated fat (11.5 vs 16.7), more protein (7 vs 5.4) than Coles Chocolate Biscuits Whirlz Honeycomb.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Chocolate Biscuits Whirlz Honeycomb
Coles Chocolate Biscuits Whirlz HoneycombColes
vs
McVitie's Hobnobs Milk Chocolate 262g
McVitie's Hobnobs Milk Chocolate 262g28% wholegrain
Sodium (lower)
183 vs 300 mg
Protein (higher)
7 vs 5.4 g
saturated (lower)
11.5 vs 16.7 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
61.4 vs 67.6 g
sugars (lower)
32.3 vs 48.7 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesMcVitie's
Energy2080 kJ (497 Cal)2070 kJ (495 Cal)
Protein5.4 g7 g
Fat, total22.2 g23.3 g
- saturated16.7 g11.5 g
- trans0.1 g-
Carbohydrate67.6 g61.4 g
- sugars48.7 g32.3 g
Dietary fibre1.9 g-
Sodium183 mg300 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each packet

Coles: see pack
McVitie's: Rolled Oats (28%), Milk Chocolate (25%) (Sugar, Milk Solids, Cocoa Butter, Cocoa Mass, Vegetable Fats, Emulsifiers (Soy Lecithin, 476), Natural Flavouring), Who
28% wholegrain
Browsing Biscuits · rankings · finder · what changed