Mckenzie's Buckwheat Flour Resealable vs McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g
Per 100 g, Mckenzie's Buckwheat Flour Resealable has less sodium (5 vs 15), more protein (13.4 vs 1) than McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Protein (higher)
13.4 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
65.4 vs 86.7 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
3 vs 1 g
McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g leads on
Fat, total (lower)
1.6 vs 4.4 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Mckenzie's | McKenzie's |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1530 kJ (366 Cal) | 1530 kJ (366 Cal) |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 1 g |
| Fat, total | 4.4 g | 1.6 g |
| - saturated | 1 g | 1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 65.4 g | 86.7 g |
| - sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Dietary fibre | 3 g | 1 g |
| Sodium | 5 mg | 15 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each pack
Mckenzie's: see pack
McKenzie's: Tapioca flour, processing aid (sulphites).