Cals
CalsBakingCompareCSR White Sugar vs Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g

CSR White Sugar vs Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g

Per 100 g, CSR White Sugar has less sodium (1 vs 5), less saturated fat (0 vs 7.2) than Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

CSR White Sugar
CSR White SugarCSR
vs
Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g
Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60gPiper's
Fat, total (lower)
0 vs 7.2 g
saturated (lower)
0 vs 7.2 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
84.3 vs 100 g
sugars (lower)
44.1 vs 100 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueCSRPiper's
Energy1700 kJ (406 Cal)1710 kJ (409 Cal)
Protein0 g0.1 g
Fat, total0 g7.2 g
- saturated0 g7.2 g
Carbohydrate100 g84.3 g
- sugars100 g44.1 g
Sodium1 mg5 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each pack

CSR: see pack
Piper's: Corn Starch, Sugar, Dextrose, Hydrogenated Palm Oil, Dextrin, Glazing Agents (903, 904), Thickener (414), Emulsifier (322) (Soy), Anticaking Agents (470, 559),
Browsing Baking · rankings · finder · what changed