Cals
CalsBakingCompareColes Simply Australian Raw Sugar vs Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g

Coles Simply Australian Raw Sugar vs Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g

Per 100 g, Coles Simply Australian Raw Sugar has less sodium (4 vs 5), less saturated fat (0 vs 7.2) than Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Simply Australian Raw Sugar
Coles Simply Australian Raw SugarColes Simply
vs
Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g
Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60gPiper's
Fat, total (lower)
0 vs 7.2 g
saturated (lower)
0 vs 7.2 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
84.3 vs 99.8 g
sugars (lower)
44.1 vs 99.8 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColes SimplyPiper's
Energy1700 kJ (406 Cal)1710 kJ (409 Cal)
Protein0 g0.1 g
Fat, total0 g7.2 g
- saturated0 g7.2 g
Carbohydrate99.8 g84.3 g
- sugars99.8 g44.1 g
Dietary fibre0 g-
Sodium4 mg5 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each pack

Coles Simply: see pack
Piper's: Corn Starch, Sugar, Dextrose, Hydrogenated Palm Oil, Dextrin, Glazing Agents (903, 904), Thickener (414), Emulsifier (322) (Soy), Anticaking Agents (470, 559),
Browsing Baking · rankings · finder · what changed