Cals
CalsBakingCompareColes Caster Sugar vs Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g

Coles Caster Sugar vs Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g

Per 100 g, Coles Caster Sugar has less sodium (0 vs 5), less saturated fat (0 vs 7.2) than Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Caster Sugar
Coles Caster SugarColes
vs
Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60g
Piper's Edible Sprinkles Disney Princess 60gPiper's
Fat, total (lower)
0 vs 7.2 g
saturated (lower)
0 vs 7.2 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
84.3 vs 100 g
sugars (lower)
44.1 vs 100 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesPiper's
Energy1700 kJ (406 Cal)1710 kJ (409 Cal)
Protein0 g0.1 g
Fat, total0 g7.2 g
- saturated0 g7.2 g
Carbohydrate100 g84.3 g
- sugars100 g44.1 g
Dietary fibre0 g-
Sodium0 mg5 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each pack

Coles: see pack
Piper's: Corn Starch, Sugar, Dextrose, Hydrogenated Palm Oil, Dextrin, Glazing Agents (903, 904), Thickener (414), Emulsifier (322) (Soy), Anticaking Agents (470, 559),
Browsing Baking · rankings · finder · what changed