Cals
CalsBakingCompareColes Caster Sugar vs CSR Muscovado Sugar

Coles Caster Sugar vs CSR Muscovado Sugar

Per 100 g, Coles Caster Sugar has less sodium (0 vs 140), less saturated fat (0 vs 1) than CSR Muscovado Sugar.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Caster Sugar
Coles Caster SugarColes
vs
CSR Muscovado Sugar
CSR Muscovado SugarCSR
Fat, total (lower)
0 vs 1 g
saturated (lower)
0 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
0 vs 140 mg
Protein (higher)
1 vs 0 g
sugars (lower)
92.5 vs 100 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesCSR
Energy1700 kJ (406 Cal)1690 kJ (404 Cal)
Protein0 g1 g
Fat, total0 g1 g
- saturated0 g1 g
Carbohydrate100 g98 g
- sugars100 g92.5 g
Dietary fibre0 g-
Sodium0 mg140 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each pack

Coles: see pack
CSR: see pack
Browsing Baking · rankings · finder · what changed