Coles Baking Powder vs McKenzie's Baking Powder 125g
Per 100 g, Coles Baking Powder has less sugar (0.1 vs 1), less saturated fat (0.1 vs 1), more protein (3 vs 2.9) than McKenzie's Baking Powder 125g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Coles Baking Powder leads on
Energy (lower)
718 vs 928 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
0.3 vs 1 g
saturated (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
38 vs 50.4 g
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
McKenzie's Baking Powder 125g leads on
Sodium (lower)
14000 vs 14800 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Coles | McKenzie's |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 718 kJ (172 Cal) | 928 kJ (222 Cal) |
| Protein | 3 g | 2.9 g |
| Fat, total | 0.3 g | 1 g |
| - saturated | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 38 g | 50.4 g |
| - sugars | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.26 g | - |
| Sodium | 14800 mg | 14000 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each pack
Coles: see pack
McKenzie's: Rice Flour, Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate (450), Sodium Bicarbonate (500)