Cals
CalsMilkComparePauls Zymil Lactose Free Low Fat Long Life Milk UHT 1L vs Rokeby Fitmilk Lactose Free Light Milk

Pauls Zymil Lactose Free Low Fat Long Life Milk UHT 1L vs Rokeby Fitmilk Lactose Free Light Milk

Per 100 mL, Rokeby Fitmilk Lactose Free Light Milk has less sugar (2.3 vs 5.1), less sodium (30 vs 47), more protein (5 vs 3.4) than Pauls Zymil Lactose Free Low Fat Long Life Milk UHT 1L.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Pauls Zymil Lactose Free Low Fat Long Life Milk UHT 1L
Pauls Zymil Lactose Free Low Fat Long Life Milk UHT 1LPauls
vs
Rokeby Fitmilk Lactose Free Light Milk
Rokeby Fitmilk Lactose Free Light MilkRokeby
Fat, total (lower)
1.2 vs 1.5 g
Energy (lower)
182 vs 194 kJ
Protein (higher)
5 vs 3.4 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
2.5 vs 5.1 g
sugars (lower)
2.3 vs 5.1 g
Sodium (lower)
30 vs 47 mg

Side by side, per 100 mL

ValuePaulsRokeby
Energy194 kJ (46 Cal)182 kJ (43 Cal)
Protein3.4 g5 g
Fat, total1.2 g1.5 g
- saturated0.8 g1 g
Carbohydrate5.1 g2.5 g
- sugars5.1 g2.3 g
Dietary fibre0 g-
Sodium47 mg30 mg
Potassium-120 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each bottle

Pauls: Low fat milk, enzyme (lactase).
Rokeby: see pack
Browsing Milk · rankings · finder · what changed