Cals › Crackers › Compare › In A Biskit Ritz Crispy Potato Crackers 145g vs Smith's Crackers Crispy Chicken 160g
In A Biskit Ritz Crispy Potato Crackers 145g vs Smith's Crackers Crispy Chicken 160g
Per 100 g, Smith's Crackers Crispy Chicken 160g has less sugar (4.4 vs 5.9), less sodium (657 vs 718), less saturated fat (1.8 vs 10.1) than In A Biskit Ritz Crispy Potato Crackers 145g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
In A Biskit Ritz Crispy Potato Crackers 145gIn A Biskit Ritz
vs
Smith's Crackers Crispy Chicken 160gSmith's
no measured leads
Smith's Crackers Crispy Chicken 160g leads on
Protein (higher)
8.7 vs 7.2 g
saturated (lower)
1.8 vs 10.1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
57.2 vs 61.6 g
sugars (lower)
4.4 vs 5.9 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
5.8 vs 3.1 g
Sodium (lower)
657 vs 718 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | In A Biskit Ritz | Smith's |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 2010 kJ (480 Cal) | 2010 kJ (480 Cal) |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 8.7 g |
| Fat, total | 21.9 g | 23 g |
| - saturated | 10.1 g | 1.8 g |
| - monounsaturated | - | 13.4 g |
| - polyunsaturated | - | 7.4 g |
| - trans | - | 0.2 g |
| Carbohydrate | 61.6 g | 57.2 g |
| - sugars | 5.9 g | 4.4 g |
| Dietary fibre | 3.1 g | 5.8 g |
| Sodium | 718 mg | 657 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each box
In A Biskit Ritz: WHEAT FLOUR, VEGETABLE OILS (CONTAIN ANTIOXIDANTS 307b,330), POTATO (5%), ICING SUGAR, MALTODEXTRIN, MILK SOLIDS, SALT, HYDROLYSED VEGETABLE PROTEIN, EMULSIFIER
Smith's: Wheat Flour, Canola Oil, Corn Starch, Oat Fibre, Sugar, Maltodextrin, Flavour Enhancers (621, 631, 627), Raising Agents (341, 500), Salt, Hydrolysed Vegetable P