Cals
CalsCrackersCompareArnott's Shapes Variety Pack 42 x 25g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Arnott's Shapes Variety Pack 42 x 25g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Per 100 g, Arnott's Shapes Variety Pack 42 x 25g has less sugar (0.9 vs 6.4), less sodium (685 vs 939), less saturated fat (5.2 vs 11.7) than In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Arnott's Shapes Variety Pack 42 x 25g
Arnott's Shapes Variety Pack 42 x 25g
vs
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160gIn A Biskit Ritz
Fat, total (lower)
22.4 vs 25.2 g
saturated (lower)
5.2 vs 11.7 g
sugars (lower)
0.9 vs 6.4 g
Sodium (lower)
685 vs 939 mg
Protein (higher)
8.6 vs 7.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
56.4 vs 63.4 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueIn A Biskit Ritz
Energy2060 kJ (492 Cal)2060 kJ (492 Cal)
Protein7.5 g8.6 g
Fat, total22.4 g25.2 g
- saturated5.2 g11.7 g
Carbohydrate63.4 g56.4 g
- sugars0.9 g6.4 g
Sodium685 mg939 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

: see pack
In A Biskit Ritz: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oils (Contains Antioxidant 307b, 330), Icing Sugar, Salt, Yeast Extract, Wheat Gluten, Milk Solids, Sugar, Invert Syrup, Maltodextrin, Fl
Browsing Crackers · rankings · finder · what changed