Cals
CalsCrackersCompareArnott's Shapes Pizza Cracker Biscuits 190g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Arnott's Shapes Pizza Cracker Biscuits 190g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Per 100 g, Arnott's Shapes Pizza Cracker Biscuits 190g has less sugar (1.2 vs 6.4), less sodium (625 vs 939), less saturated fat (5.6 vs 11.7) than In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Arnott's Shapes Pizza Cracker Biscuits 190g
Arnott's Shapes Pizza Cracker Biscuits 190gArnott's
vs
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160gIn A Biskit Ritz
Fat, total (lower)
23.1 vs 25.2 g
saturated (lower)
5.6 vs 11.7 g
sugars (lower)
1.2 vs 6.4 g
Sodium (lower)
625 vs 939 mg
Protein (higher)
8.6 vs 7.9 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
56.4 vs 61.8 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueArnott'sIn A Biskit Ritz
Energy2070 kJ (495 Cal)2060 kJ (492 Cal)
Protein7.9 g8.6 g
Fat, total23.1 g25.2 g
- saturated5.6 g11.7 g
Carbohydrate61.8 g56.4 g
- sugars1.2 g6.4 g
Dietary fibre3.3 g-
Sodium625 mg939 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

Arnott's: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oil (Antioxidant (E307b From Soy), Tomato Powder, Maltodextrin (Maize), Cheese (Contains Milk), Salt, Starch (Wheat), Yeast, Sugar, Milk
In A Biskit Ritz: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oils (Contains Antioxidant 307b, 330), Icing Sugar, Salt, Yeast Extract, Wheat Gluten, Milk Solids, Sugar, Invert Syrup, Maltodextrin, Fl
Browsing Crackers · rankings · finder · what changed