Cals
CalsCrackersCompareArnott's Shapes Cracker Biscuits Barbecue 8 pack vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Arnott's Shapes Cracker Biscuits Barbecue 8 pack vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Per 100 g, Arnott's Shapes Cracker Biscuits Barbecue 8 pack has less sugar (0.7 vs 6.4), less sodium (687 vs 939), less saturated fat (5.3 vs 11.7) than In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Arnott's Shapes Cracker Biscuits Barbecue 8 pack
Arnott's Shapes Cracker Biscuits Barbecue 8 packArnott's
vs
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160gIn A Biskit Ritz
Fat, total (lower)
22.4 vs 25.2 g
saturated (lower)
5.3 vs 11.7 g
sugars (lower)
0.7 vs 6.4 g
Sodium (lower)
687 vs 939 mg
Protein (higher)
8.6 vs 7.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
56.4 vs 62.9 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueArnott'sIn A Biskit Ritz
Energy2050 kJ (490 Cal)2060 kJ (492 Cal)
Protein7.5 g8.6 g
Fat, total22.4 g25.2 g
- saturated5.3 g11.7 g
- monounsaturated0 g-
- polyunsaturated0 g-
- trans0 g-
Carbohydrate62.9 g56.4 g
- sugars0.7 g6.4 g
Dietary fibre3.4 g-
Sodium687 mg939 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

Arnott's: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oil (Antioxidant (E307b From Soy)), Tomato Powder, Starch (Wheat), Salt, Yeast, Garlic Powder, Parsley, Sugar, Worcestershire Sauce, Natu
In A Biskit Ritz: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oils (Contains Antioxidant 307b, 330), Icing Sugar, Salt, Yeast Extract, Wheat Gluten, Milk Solids, Sugar, Invert Syrup, Maltodextrin, Fl
Browsing Crackers · rankings · finder · what changed