Cals
CalsCrackersCompareArnott's Shapes Barbecue Cracker Biscuits 175g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Arnott's Shapes Barbecue Cracker Biscuits 175g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Per 100 g, Arnott's Shapes Barbecue Cracker Biscuits 175g has less sugar (0.7 vs 6.4), less sodium (687 vs 939), less saturated fat (5.3 vs 11.7) than In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Arnott's Shapes Barbecue Cracker Biscuits 175g
Arnott's Shapes Barbecue Cracker Biscuits 175gArnott's
vs
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160gIn A Biskit Ritz
Fat, total (lower)
22.4 vs 25.2 g
saturated (lower)
5.3 vs 11.7 g
sugars (lower)
0.7 vs 6.4 g
Sodium (lower)
687 vs 939 mg
Protein (higher)
8.6 vs 7.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
56.4 vs 62.9 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueArnott'sIn A Biskit Ritz
Energy2050 kJ (490 Cal)2060 kJ (492 Cal)
Protein7.5 g8.6 g
Fat, total22.4 g25.2 g
- saturated5.3 g11.7 g
Carbohydrate62.9 g56.4 g
- sugars0.7 g6.4 g
Dietary fibre3.4 g-
Sodium687 mg939 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

Arnott's: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oil (Antioxidant (E307b From Soy)), Tomato Powder, Starch (Wheat), Salt, Yeast, Garlic Powder, Parsley, Sugar, Worcestershire Sauce, Natu
In A Biskit Ritz: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oils (Contains Antioxidant 307b, 330), Icing Sugar, Salt, Yeast Extract, Wheat Gluten, Milk Solids, Sugar, Invert Syrup, Maltodextrin, Fl
Browsing Crackers · rankings · finder · what changed