Cals › Crackers › Compare › Arnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110g vs Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour Snack Bags 8 pack
Arnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110g vs Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour Snack Bags 8 pack
Per 100 g, Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour Snack Bags 8 pack has less sugar (6.5 vs 8.8), less sodium (592 vs 671), more protein (6.9 vs 1.9) than Arnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Arnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110gArnott's
vs
Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour Snack Bags 8 packRitz
saturated (lower)
2.5 vs 7.9 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
1.2 vs 0 g
Protein (higher)
6.9 vs 1.9 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
59.3 vs 67.1 g
sugars (lower)
6.5 vs 8.8 g
Sodium (lower)
592 vs 671 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Arnott's | Ritz |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 2090 kJ (500 Cal) | 2080 kJ (497 Cal) |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 6.9 g |
| Fat, total | 24.5 g | 25.2 g |
| - saturated | 2.5 g | 7.9 g |
| - monounsaturated | - | 0 g |
| - polyunsaturated | - | 0 g |
| - trans | - | 0 g |
| Carbohydrate | 67.1 g | 59.3 g |
| - sugars | 8.8 g | 6.5 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Sodium | 671 mg | 592 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each box
Arnott's: Starch (Tapioca, Maize), Vegetable Oil, Rice Flour, Golden Syrup, Sugar, Thickener (Xanthan Gum), Raising Agents (E500, E341, E450), Modified Starch (E1412), Sa
Ritz: WHEAT FLOUR, VEGETABLE OILS (CONTAINS ANTIOXIDANTS (307b, 330)), SUGAR, INVERT SUGAR, SALT, BARLEY MALT EXTRACT, RAISING AGENTS (500, 503), EMULSIFIER (SOY LECI