Cals
CalsCrackersCompareArnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110g vs Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160g

Arnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110g vs Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160g

Per 100 g, Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160g has less sugar (6.5 vs 8.8), less sodium (592 vs 671), more protein (6.9 vs 1.9) than Arnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Arnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110g
Arnott's Gluten Free Shapes Chicken Crimpy Gluten Free 110gArnott's
vs
Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160g
Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160gRitz
saturated (lower)
2.5 vs 7.9 g
Protein (higher)
6.9 vs 1.9 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
59.3 vs 67.1 g
sugars (lower)
6.5 vs 8.8 g
Sodium (lower)
592 vs 671 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueArnott'sRitz
Energy2090 kJ (500 Cal)2080 kJ (497 Cal)
Protein1.9 g6.9 g
Fat, total24.5 g25.2 g
- saturated2.5 g7.9 g
Carbohydrate67.1 g59.3 g
- sugars8.8 g6.5 g
Dietary fibre1.2 g-
Sodium671 mg592 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

Arnott's: Starch (Tapioca, Maize), Vegetable Oil, Rice Flour, Golden Syrup, Sugar, Thickener (Xanthan Gum), Raising Agents (E500, E341, E450), Modified Starch (E1412), Sa
Ritz: WHEAT FLOUR, VEGETABLE OILS (CONTAINS ANTIOXIDANTS (307b, 330)), SUGAR, INVERT SUGAR, SALT, BARLEY MALT EXTRACT, RAISING AGENTS (500, 503), EMULSIFIER (SOY LECI
Browsing Crackers · rankings · finder · what changed