Cals
CalsCrackersCompareArnott's Gluten Free Savoy Original Crackers vs Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160g

Arnott's Gluten Free Savoy Original Crackers vs Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160g

Per 100 g, Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160g has less sugar (6.5 vs 6.6), less sodium (592 vs 654), more protein (6.9 vs 2) than Arnott's Gluten Free Savoy Original Crackers.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Arnott's Gluten Free Savoy Original Crackers
Arnott's Gluten Free Savoy Original CrackersArnott's
vs
Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160g
Ritz Mini Crackers Original Flavour 160gRitz
saturated (lower)
2.5 vs 7.9 g
Protein (higher)
6.9 vs 2 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
59.3 vs 67.4 g
Sodium (lower)
592 vs 654 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueArnott'sRitz
Energy2090 kJ (500 Cal)2080 kJ (497 Cal)
Protein2 g6.9 g
Fat, total24.4 g25.2 g
- saturated2.5 g7.9 g
- monounsaturated0 g-
- polyunsaturated0 g-
- trans0 g-
Carbohydrate67.4 g59.3 g
- sugars6.6 g6.5 g
Dietary fibre1.3 g-
Sodium654 mg592 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

Arnott's: see pack
Ritz: WHEAT FLOUR, VEGETABLE OILS (CONTAINS ANTIOXIDANTS (307b, 330)), SUGAR, INVERT SUGAR, SALT, BARLEY MALT EXTRACT, RAISING AGENTS (500, 503), EMULSIFIER (SOY LECI
Browsing Crackers · rankings · finder · what changed