Cals
CalsCrackersCompareArnott's Clix Crackers 250g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Arnott's Clix Crackers 250g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Per 100 g, Arnott's Clix Crackers 250g has less sugar (5.8 vs 6.4), less sodium (831 vs 939), less saturated fat (6.1 vs 11.7) than In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Arnott's Clix Crackers 250g
Arnott's Clix Crackers 250gArnott's
vs
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160gIn A Biskit Ritz
saturated (lower)
6.1 vs 11.7 g
sugars (lower)
5.8 vs 6.4 g
Sodium (lower)
831 vs 939 mg
Protein (higher)
8.6 vs 6.8 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueArnott'sIn A Biskit Ritz
Energy2060 kJ (492 Cal)2060 kJ (492 Cal)
Protein6.8 g8.6 g
Fat, total24.7 g25.2 g
- saturated6.1 g11.7 g
- monounsaturated0 g-
- polyunsaturated0 g-
- trans0 g-
Carbohydrate59.2 g56.4 g
- sugars5.8 g6.4 g
Dietary fibre2.8 g-
Sodium831 mg939 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

Arnott's: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oil (Antioxidant (E307b From Soy)), Sugar, Baking Powder, Salt, Herb Extract.
In A Biskit Ritz: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oils (Contains Antioxidant 307b, 330), Icing Sugar, Salt, Yeast Extract, Wheat Gluten, Milk Solids, Sugar, Invert Syrup, Maltodextrin, Fl
Browsing Crackers · rankings · finder · what changed