Cals
CalsCrackersCompareArnott's Bizza Shapes Crackers 170g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Arnott's Bizza Shapes Crackers 170g vs In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g

Per 100 g, Arnott's Bizza Shapes Crackers 170g has less sugar (2.3 vs 6.4), less sodium (716 vs 939), less saturated fat (5.7 vs 11.7) than In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Arnott's Bizza Shapes Crackers 170g
Arnott's Bizza Shapes Crackers 170gArnott's
vs
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160g
In A Biskit Ritz Chicken Crackers 160gIn A Biskit Ritz
Protein (higher)
9.1 vs 8.6 g
Fat, total (lower)
23.8 vs 25.2 g
saturated (lower)
5.7 vs 11.7 g
sugars (lower)
2.3 vs 6.4 g
Sodium (lower)
716 vs 939 mg
no measured leads

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueArnott'sIn A Biskit Ritz
Energy2070 kJ (495 Cal)2060 kJ (492 Cal)
Protein9.1 g8.6 g
Fat, total23.8 g25.2 g
- saturated5.7 g11.7 g
Carbohydrate59.1 g56.4 g
- sugars2.3 g6.4 g
Dietary fibre3.5 g-
Sodium716 mg939 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

Arnott's: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oil (Antioxidant (307b From Soy), Salt, Tomato Powder, Starches (Maize, Wheat), Maltodextrin, Cheese (Milk), Yeast, Dried Parsley, Glucos
In A Biskit Ritz: Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oils (Contains Antioxidant 307b, 330), Icing Sugar, Salt, Yeast Extract, Wheat Gluten, Milk Solids, Sugar, Invert Syrup, Maltodextrin, Fl
Browsing Crackers · rankings · finder · what changed