Cals › Condiments › Compare › BAXTERS Fig, Date and Balsamic Chutney 225g vs Coles Caramelised Onion & Balsamic Chutney
BAXTERS Fig, Date and Balsamic Chutney 225g vs Coles Caramelised Onion & Balsamic Chutney
Per 100 g, BAXTERS Fig, Date and Balsamic Chutney 225g has less sugar (46.8 vs 53), more protein (1 vs 0.5) than Coles Caramelised Onion & Balsamic Chutney.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
BAXTERS Fig, Date and Balsamic Chutney 225gBAXTERS
vs
Coles Caramelised Onion & Balsamic ChutneyColes
Energy (lower)
982 vs 1130 kJ
Protein (higher)
1 vs 0.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
56.1 vs 63.5 g
sugars (lower)
46.8 vs 53 g
saturated (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
180 vs 287 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | BAXTERS | Coles |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 982 kJ (235 Cal) | 1130 kJ (270 Cal) |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fat, total | 1 g | 1 g |
| - saturated | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 56.1 g | 63.5 g |
| - sugars | 46.8 g | 53 g |
| Dietary fibre | - | 0.9 g |
| Sodium | 287 mg | 180 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bottle
BAXTERS: see pack
Coles: see pack