Cals
CalsChocolateCompareLindt Lindor Milk Chocolate Block 100g vs Whittaker's Block Coconut 33% Cocoa 250g

Lindt Lindor Milk Chocolate Block 100g vs Whittaker's Block Coconut 33% Cocoa 250g

Per 100 g, Whittaker's Block Coconut 33% Cocoa 250g has more cocoa (33% vs 30%), less sugar (37.2 vs 43), less sodium (60 vs 66) than Lindt Lindor Milk Chocolate Block 100g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Lindt Lindor Milk Chocolate Block 100g
Lindt Lindor Milk Chocolate Block 100g30% cocoa
vs
Whittaker's Block Coconut 33% Cocoa 250g
Whittaker's Block Coconut 33% Cocoa 250g33% cocoa
no measured leads
Energy (lower)
2430 vs 2590 kJ
Protein (higher)
8.8 vs 4.7 g
Fat, total (lower)
40.8 vs 46.9 g
saturated (lower)
26.3 vs 35.4 g
sugars (lower)
37.2 vs 43 g
More cocoa
33% vs 30%

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueLindtWhittaker's
Energy2590 kJ (619 Cal)2430 kJ (581 Cal)
Protein4.7 g8.8 g
Fat, total46.9 g40.8 g
- saturated35.4 g26.3 g
Carbohydrate44.3 g45.8 g
- sugars43 g37.2 g
Sodium66 mg60 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each block

Lindt: Sugar, vegetable fats, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, whole milk powder, lactose (milk), skim milk powder, milk fat, emulsifier (soy lecithin), barley malt extract,
30% cocoa
Whittaker's: MILK COCOLATE SUGAR, COCOA SOLIDS+ 33%* (PURE COCOA BUTTER+ & COCOA MASS+), NZ MILK POWDER 30%*, EMULSIFIER (SOY LECITHIN), VANILLA FLAVOUR; TOASTED COCONUT 18%
33% cocoa
Browsing Chocolate · rankings · finder · what changed