Cals › Cakes & muffins › Compare › Signature Sweets White Chocolate Hazelnut Cake vs Woolworths Vanilla Cake With Biscoff 450g
Signature Sweets White Chocolate Hazelnut Cake vs Woolworths Vanilla Cake With Biscoff 450g
Per 100 g, Signature Sweets White Chocolate Hazelnut Cake has less sodium (234 vs 257), less saturated fat (6 vs 10.9), more protein (4.6 vs 3.4) than Woolworths Vanilla Cake With Biscoff 450g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Signature Sweets White Chocolate Hazelnut CakeSignature Sweets
vs
Woolworths Vanilla Cake With Biscoff 450gWoolworths
Protein (higher)
4.6 vs 3.4 g
saturated (lower)
6 vs 10.9 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
50.7 vs 59 g
Sodium (lower)
234 vs 257 mg
Fat, total (lower)
16.7 vs 19.7 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
33.8 vs 39.1 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Signature Sweets | Woolworths |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1669 kJ (399 Cal) | 1680 kJ (402 Cal) |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 3.4 g |
| Fat, total | 19.7 g | 16.7 g |
| - saturated | 6 g | 10.9 g |
| - trans | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 50.7 g | 59 g |
| - sugars | 39.1 g | 33.8 g |
| Sodium | 234 mg | 257 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each pack
Signature Sweets: see pack
Woolworths: Flour (Wheat Flour, Vitamins (Thiamine, Folate)),Water, Icing Sugar Mixture (Sugar, Maize Starch),Golden Syrup, Lotus Biscoff Paste (8%) (Lotus Biscoff Biscuits