Cals › Bread › Compare › Coles Tiger Vienna vs Warburtons Gluten Free Soft Sliced Brioche Style Rolls 4 Pack
Coles Tiger Vienna vs Warburtons Gluten Free Soft Sliced Brioche Style Rolls 4 Pack
Per 100 g, Coles Tiger Vienna has less sugar (1.4 vs 7.5), less sodium (282 vs 320), more protein (7.9 vs 6.1) than Warburtons Gluten Free Soft Sliced Brioche Style Rolls 4 Pack.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Coles Tiger Vienna leads on
Energy (lower)
1030 vs 1058 kJ
Protein (higher)
7.9 vs 6.1 g
Fat, total (lower)
1.7 vs 8.4 g
sugars (lower)
1.4 vs 7.5 g
Sodium (lower)
282 vs 320 mg
Carbohydrate (lower)
36.4 vs 48 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
3 vs 2.5 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Coles | Warburtons |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1030 kJ (246 Cal) | 1058 kJ (253 Cal) |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 6.1 g |
| Fat, total | 1.7 g | 8.4 g |
| - saturated | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Carbohydrate | 48 g | 36.4 g |
| - sugars | 1.4 g | 7.5 g |
| Dietary fibre | 2.5 g | 3 g |
| Sodium | 282 mg | 320 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each loaf
Coles: see pack
Warburtons: see pack