Cals › Stock & gravy › Compare › Coles Liquid Real Stock Beef vs Massel Salt Reduced Liquid Chicken Stock
Coles Liquid Real Stock Beef vs Massel Salt Reduced Liquid Chicken Stock
Per 100 g, Massel Salt Reduced Liquid Chicken Stock has less sugar (0.46 vs 0.86), less sodium (307 vs 350), less saturated fat (0.02 vs 0.09) than Coles Liquid Real Stock Beef.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Coles Liquid Real Stock Beef leads on
Protein (higher)
0.4 vs 0.08 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.61 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
0.46 vs 0.86 g
Sodium (lower)
307 vs 350 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Coles | Massel |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 24.9 kJ (6 Cal) | 21.8 kJ (5 Cal) |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.08 g |
| Fat, total | 0.03 g | 0.27 g |
| - saturated | 0.09 g | 0.02 g |
| - monounsaturated | - | 0 g |
| - polyunsaturated | - | 0 g |
| - trans | - | 0 g |
| Carbohydrate | 1 g | 0.61 g |
| - sugars | 0.86 g | 0.46 g |
| Dietary fibre | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sodium | 350 mg | 307 mg |
| Potassium | - | 67500 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each carton
Coles: see pack
Massel: see pack