Cals
CalsParty foodCompareColes Vegetable Spring Rolls 16 Pack vs Tak Hing Taro Bao 240g

Coles Vegetable Spring Rolls 16 Pack vs Tak Hing Taro Bao 240g

Per 100 g, Coles Vegetable Spring Rolls 16 Pack has less sugar (3.1 vs 12.3), less saturated fat (2.2 vs 2.5) than Tak Hing Taro Bao 240g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Vegetable Spring Rolls 16 Pack
Coles Vegetable Spring Rolls 16 PackColes
vs
Tak Hing Taro Bao 240g
Tak Hing Taro Bao 240gTak Hing
Energy (lower)
1080 vs 1154 kJ
saturated (lower)
2.2 vs 2.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
31.3 vs 45 g
sugars (lower)
3.1 vs 12.3 g
Protein (higher)
5.8 vs 4.5 g
Fat, total (lower)
7.3 vs 12.1 g
Sodium (lower)
57 vs 380 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesTak Hing
Energy1080 kJ (258 Cal)1154 kJ (276 Cal)
Protein4.5 g5.8 g
Fat, total12.1 g7.3 g
- saturated2.2 g2.5 g
- trans1 g-
Carbohydrate31.3 g45 g
- sugars3.1 g12.3 g
Dietary fibre2.7 g-
Sodium380 mg57 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

Coles: see pack
Tak Hing: Wheat Flour, Taro (25%), Water, Sugar, Shortening (Vegetable Oil, Antioxidant (330)), Canola Oil, Potato Starch, Coconut Milk, Yeast, Soy Flour, Colouring (171)
Browsing Party food · rankings · finder · what changed