Cals › Party food › Compare › Bibigo Bao Buns Vegetable & Glass Noodles 320g vs Tak Hing Honey Soy Chicken Bao 4 pack
Bibigo Bao Buns Vegetable & Glass Noodles 320g vs Tak Hing Honey Soy Chicken Bao 4 pack
Per 100 g, Bibigo Bao Buns Vegetable & Glass Noodles 320g has less sugar (4.4 vs 17.1), less sodium (180 vs 363) than Tak Hing Honey Soy Chicken Bao 4 pack.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Bibigo Bao Buns Vegetable & Glass Noodles 320g14% filling
vs
Tak Hing Honey Soy Chicken Bao 4 pack14% filling
Energy (lower)
992 vs 1121 kJ
Carbohydrate (lower)
34.8 vs 46.2 g
sugars (lower)
4.4 vs 17.1 g
Sodium (lower)
180 vs 363 mg
Protein (higher)
9.2 vs 6.4 g
Fat, total (lower)
4.2 vs 7.9 g
saturated (lower)
1.1 vs 2.8 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Bibigo | Tak Hing |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 992 kJ (237 Cal) | 1121 kJ (268 Cal) |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 9.2 g |
| Fat, total | 7.9 g | 4.2 g |
| - saturated | 2.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 34.8 g | 46.2 g |
| - sugars | 4.4 g | 17.1 g |
| Dietary fibre | 2.2 g | - |
| Sodium | 180 mg | 363 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each box
Bibigo: Wheat Flour, Water, Vegetables (14%) (Cabbage, Car rots, Spinach, Green Onions, Garlic), Palm Shortening [Antioxidants (307, 322 (Soy)), Emulsifier (471)], Shii
14% filling
Tak Hing: Wheat Flour, Water, Chicken (14%), Sugar, Mirin, Soy Sauce (3%), Onion, Shortening (Vegetable Oil), Canola Oil, Honey (1%), Sake, Potato Starch, Corn Starch, Wh
14% filling