Cals › Non-alcoholic › Compare › Brown Brothers Prosecco Rose Zero 750mL vs Edenvale Non Alcoholic Wine Sparkling Cuvee 750mL
Brown Brothers Prosecco Rose Zero 750mL vs Edenvale Non Alcoholic Wine Sparkling Cuvee 750mL
Per 100 mL, Brown Brothers Prosecco Rose Zero 750mL has less sugar (2.1 vs 5.6), less sodium (2.8 vs 35) than Edenvale Non Alcoholic Wine Sparkling Cuvee 750mL.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Brown Brothers Prosecco Rose Zero 750mLBrown Brothers
vs
Edenvale Non Alcoholic Wine Sparkling Cuvee 750mL6% brew or grape
Energy (lower)
72 vs 102 kJ
Carbohydrate (lower)
5 vs 6.2 g
sugars (lower)
2.1 vs 5.6 g
Sodium (lower)
2.8 vs 35 mg
no measured leads
Side by side, per 100 mL
| Value | Brown Brothers | Edenvale |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 72 kJ (17 Cal) | 102 kJ (24 Cal) |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fat, total | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| - saturated | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 5 g | 6.2 g |
| - sugars | 2.1 g | 5.6 g |
| Sodium | 2.8 mg | 35 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bottle
Brown Brothers: see pack
Edenvale: De-Alcoholised Wine (94% approx), Grape Juice Concentrate (6% approx)
6% brew or grape