Cals › Muesli bars › Compare › Trek Oat Biscoff vs Well Naturally Bars Mint Chocolate Sugar Free 90g
Trek Oat Biscoff vs Well Naturally Bars Mint Chocolate Sugar Free 90g
Per 100 g, Well Naturally Bars Mint Chocolate Sugar Free 90g has less sugar (1 vs 23.9), less sodium (6 vs 306) than Trek Oat Biscoff.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Trek Oat Biscoff leads on
Protein (higher)
19.6 vs 6.7 g
Fat, total (lower)
21.3 vs 39.4 g
saturated (lower)
8.8 vs 24 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
3.6 vs 45.3 g
sugars (lower)
1 vs 23.9 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
20.2 vs 4.4 g
Sodium (lower)
6 vs 306 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Trek | Well Naturally |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1930 kJ (461 Cal) | 1910 kJ (457 Cal) |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 6.7 g |
| Fat, total | 21.3 g | 39.4 g |
| - saturated | 8.8 g | 24 g |
| Carbohydrate | 45.3 g | 3.6 g |
| - sugars | 23.9 g | 1 g |
| Dietary fibre | 4.4 g | 20.2 g |
| Sodium | 306 mg | 6 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bar
Trek: see pack
Well Naturally: Cocoa Mass, Erythritol, Polydextrose, Cocoa Butter, Mint Chips (10%) [Isomalt, Cocoa Butter, Pepperm int Oil, Colour (141)], Anhydrous Milk Fat, Emulsi fiers (3