Cals
CalsMuesli barsCompareNoshu Low Carb Choc Hazelnut Indulgence Bars 5 Pack vs Tom & Luke Protein Snackaballs Sticky Date

Noshu Low Carb Choc Hazelnut Indulgence Bars 5 Pack vs Tom & Luke Protein Snackaballs Sticky Date

Per 100 g, Tom & Luke Protein Snackaballs Sticky Date has less sodium (142 vs 161), less saturated fat (2.3 vs 15.3), more protein (20.2 vs 15.9) than Noshu Low Carb Choc Hazelnut Indulgence Bars 5 Pack.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Noshu Low Carb Choc Hazelnut Indulgence Bars 5 Pack
Noshu Low Carb Choc Hazelnut Indulgence Bars 5 PackNoshu
vs
Tom & Luke Protein Snackaballs Sticky Date
Tom & Luke Protein Snackaballs Sticky DateTom & Luke
Carbohydrate (lower)
15.9 vs 40.6 g
sugars (lower)
7.5 vs 28.5 g
Protein (higher)
20.2 vs 15.9 g
Fat, total (lower)
15.4 vs 25.3 g
saturated (lower)
2.3 vs 15.3 g
Sodium (lower)
142 vs 161 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueNoshuTom & Luke
Energy1690 kJ (404 Cal)1690 kJ (404 Cal)
Protein15.9 g20.2 g
Fat, total25.3 g15.4 g
- saturated15.3 g2.3 g
Carbohydrate15.9 g40.6 g
- sugars7.5 g28.5 g
Dietary fibre-10.7 g
Sodium161 mg142 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each bar

Noshu: see pack
Tom & Luke: see pack
Browsing Muesli bars · rankings · finder · what changed