Cals › Muesli bars › Compare › HILLCREST White Choc & Raspberry Oat Bars 6 Pack 240g vs Trek Oat Biscoff
HILLCREST White Choc & Raspberry Oat Bars 6 Pack 240g vs Trek Oat Biscoff
Per 100 g, Trek Oat Biscoff has less sugar (23.9 vs 32.1), less saturated fat (8.8 vs 13.4), more protein (19.6 vs 7.1) than HILLCREST White Choc & Raspberry Oat Bars 6 Pack 240g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Sodium (lower)
206 vs 306 mg
Trek Oat Biscoff leads on
Protein (higher)
19.6 vs 7.1 g
saturated (lower)
8.8 vs 13.4 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
45.3 vs 61.4 g
sugars (lower)
23.9 vs 32.1 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | HILLCREST | Trek |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1960 kJ (468 Cal) | 1930 kJ (461 Cal) |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 19.6 g |
| Fat, total | 21 g | 21.3 g |
| - saturated | 13.4 g | 8.8 g |
| Carbohydrate | 61.4 g | 45.3 g |
| - sugars | 32.1 g | 23.9 g |
| Dietary fibre | - | 4.4 g |
| Sodium | 206 mg | 306 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bar
HILLCREST: see pack
Trek: see pack