Cals › Muesli bars › Compare › HILLCREST Low Sugar Delight Bars Choc Coconut 5 Pack 160g vs Trek Oat Biscoff
HILLCREST Low Sugar Delight Bars Choc Coconut 5 Pack 160g vs Trek Oat Biscoff
Per 100 g, HILLCREST Low Sugar Delight Bars Choc Coconut 5 Pack 160g has less sugar (3.6 vs 23.9), less sodium (27 vs 306) than Trek Oat Biscoff.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Carbohydrate (lower)
10.4 vs 45.3 g
sugars (lower)
3.6 vs 23.9 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
25.3 vs 4.4 g
Sodium (lower)
27 vs 306 mg
Trek Oat Biscoff leads on
Protein (higher)
19.6 vs 3.5 g
Fat, total (lower)
21.3 vs 34.9 g
saturated (lower)
8.8 vs 32 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | HILLCREST | Trek |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1910 kJ (457 Cal) | 1930 kJ (461 Cal) |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 19.6 g |
| Fat, total | 34.9 g | 21.3 g |
| - saturated | 32 g | 8.8 g |
| Carbohydrate | 10.4 g | 45.3 g |
| - sugars | 3.6 g | 23.9 g |
| Dietary fibre | 25.3 g | 4.4 g |
| Sodium | 27 mg | 306 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bar
HILLCREST: see pack
Trek: see pack