Cals › Muesli bars › Compare › BSc High Protein Bar Choc Fudge vs Tom & Luke Low Carb Snackaballs Chocolate Coated Hazelnut
BSc High Protein Bar Choc Fudge vs Tom & Luke Low Carb Snackaballs Chocolate Coated Hazelnut
Per 100 g, BSc High Protein Bar Choc Fudge has less sugar (1.8 vs 11.4), less saturated fat (7.4 vs 17.5), more protein (52.2 vs 8.5) than Tom & Luke Low Carb Snackaballs Chocolate Coated Hazelnut.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
BSc High Protein Bar Choc FudgeBSc
vs
Tom & Luke Low Carb Snackaballs Chocolate Coated HazelnutTom & Luke
BSc High Protein Bar Choc Fudge leads on
Protein (higher)
52.2 vs 8.5 g
Fat, total (lower)
13.7 vs 30.8 g
saturated (lower)
7.4 vs 17.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
3.5 vs 17.6 g
sugars (lower)
1.8 vs 11.4 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
25.1 vs 0.5 g
Sodium (lower)
61 vs 280 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | BSc | Tom & Luke |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1780 kJ (425 Cal) | 1780 kJ (425 Cal) |
| Protein | 52.2 g | 8.5 g |
| Fat, total | 13.7 g | 30.8 g |
| - saturated | 7.4 g | 17.5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 3.5 g | 17.6 g |
| - sugars | 1.8 g | 11.4 g |
| Dietary fibre | 0.5 g | 25.1 g |
| Sodium | 280 mg | 61 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bar
BSc: see pack
Tom & Luke: see pack