Cals › Muesli bars › Compare › BC Snacks Dark Chocolate Coconut Plant Based Protein Bar 40g vs Tom & Luke Low Carb Snackaballs Chocolate Coated Hazelnut
BC Snacks Dark Chocolate Coconut Plant Based Protein Bar 40g vs Tom & Luke Low Carb Snackaballs Chocolate Coated Hazelnut
Per 100 g, Tom & Luke Low Carb Snackaballs Chocolate Coated Hazelnut has less sugar (11.4 vs 21.4), less sodium (61 vs 97) than BC Snacks Dark Chocolate Coconut Plant Based Protein Bar 40g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
BC Snacks Dark Chocolate Coconut Plant Based Protein Bar 40gBC Snacks
vs
Tom & Luke Low Carb Snackaballs Chocolate Coated HazelnutTom & Luke
Protein (higher)
16.1 vs 8.5 g
Fat, total (lower)
22.2 vs 30.8 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
17.6 vs 34.9 g
sugars (lower)
11.4 vs 21.4 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
25.1 vs 8.2 g
Sodium (lower)
61 vs 97 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | BC Snacks | Tom & Luke |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1780 kJ (425 Cal) | 1780 kJ (425 Cal) |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 8.5 g |
| Fat, total | 22.2 g | 30.8 g |
| - saturated | 16.7 g | 17.5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 34.9 g | 17.6 g |
| - sugars | 21.4 g | 11.4 g |
| Dietary fibre | 8.2 g | 25.1 g |
| Sodium | 97 mg | 61 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bar
BC Snacks: Dates, No Added Sugar Dark Chocolate Compound 20% (Sweetener (Maltitol), Vegetable Fat, Cocoa Powder 10%, Soy Protein Isolate, Emulsifiers (Soy Lecithin, 476),
Tom & Luke: see pack