Cals
CalsLolliesCompareColes Snakes vs Haribo Twin Snakes Sweet & Sour

Coles Snakes vs Haribo Twin Snakes Sweet & Sour

Per 100 g, Haribo Twin Snakes Sweet & Sour has less sugar (45.6 vs 50.4), less saturated fat (0.1 vs 1), more protein (6.9 vs 6.8) than Coles Snakes.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Snakes
Coles SnakesColes
vs
Haribo Twin Snakes Sweet & Sour
Haribo Twin Snakes Sweet & SourHaribo
Coles Snakes leads on
Sodium (lower)
5 vs 30 mg
Fat, total (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
saturated (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
45.6 vs 50.4 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesHaribo
Energy1460 kJ (349 Cal)1460 kJ (349 Cal)
Protein6.8 g6.9 g
Fat, total1 g0.1 g
- saturated1 g0.1 g
- trans1 g-
Carbohydrate78.3 g77.4 g
- sugars50.4 g45.6 g
Dietary fibre1 g-
Sodium5 mg30 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each bag

Coles: see pack
Haribo: see pack
Browsing Lollies · rankings · finder · what changed