Cals
CalsLolliesCompareChupa Chups Faces Flat Lollipops 35 pack vs Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g

Chupa Chups Faces Flat Lollipops 35 pack vs Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g

Per 100 g, Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g has less sugar (4.9 vs 71.4), more protein (27.1 vs 0.1) than Chupa Chups Faces Flat Lollipops 35 pack.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Chupa Chups Faces Flat Lollipops 35 pack
Chupa Chups Faces Flat Lollipops 35 packChupa Chups
vs
Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g
Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38gSarah Di Lorenzo 10:10
Fat, total (lower)
0 vs 17.1 g
saturated (lower)
0 vs 11.9 g
Sodium (lower)
105 vs 304 mg
Energy (lower)
1580 vs 1640 kJ
Protein (higher)
27.1 vs 0.1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
16.2 vs 94.7 g
sugars (lower)
4.9 vs 71.4 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueChupa ChupsSarah Di Lorenzo 10:10
Energy1640 kJ (392 Cal)1580 kJ (378 Cal)
Protein0.1 g27.1 g
Fat, total0 g17.1 g
- saturated0 g11.9 g
Carbohydrate94.7 g16.2 g
- sugars71.4 g4.9 g
Dietary fibre-17 g
Sodium105 mg304 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each bag

Chupa Chups: sugar, glucose syrup, acids (lactic acid, malic ac id, citric acid), acidity regulator (sodium lactat e), flavourings, colours (caramel IV, paprika oleo resins,
Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10: see pack
Browsing Lollies · rankings · finder · what changed