Cals › Lollies › Compare › Chupa Chups Candy Cane Lollipops vs Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g
Chupa Chups Candy Cane Lollipops vs Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g
Per 100 g, Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g has less sugar (4.9 vs 83), more protein (27.1 vs 0) than Chupa Chups Candy Cane Lollipops.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Chupa Chups Candy Cane LollipopsChupa Chups
vs
Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38gSarah Di Lorenzo 10:10
Chupa Chups Candy Cane Lollipops leads on
Fat, total (lower)
0 vs 17.1 g
saturated (lower)
0 vs 11.9 g
Sodium (lower)
39 vs 304 mg
Energy (lower)
1580 vs 1670 kJ
Protein (higher)
27.1 vs 0 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
16.2 vs 98.1 g
sugars (lower)
4.9 vs 83 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
17 vs 0 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Chupa Chups | Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1670 kJ (399 Cal) | 1580 kJ (378 Cal) |
| Protein | 0 g | 27.1 g |
| Fat, total | 0 g | 17.1 g |
| - saturated | 0 g | 11.9 g |
| - monounsaturated | 0 g | - |
| - polyunsaturated | 0 g | - |
| - trans | 0 g | - |
| Carbohydrate | 98.1 g | 16.2 g |
| - sugars | 83 g | 4.9 g |
| Dietary fibre | 0 g | 17 g |
| Sodium | 39 mg | 304 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bag
Chupa Chups: see pack
Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10: see pack