Cals
CalsChocolateCompareLindt Lindor 70% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bag 123g vs Whittaker's Block Dark Almond 200g

Lindt Lindor 70% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bag 123g vs Whittaker's Block Dark Almond 200g

Per 100 g, Whittaker's Block Dark Almond 200g has less saturated fat (14.6 vs 38), more protein (11.4 vs 6.6) than Lindt Lindor 70% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bag 123g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Lindt Lindor 70% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bag 123g
Lindt Lindor 70% Cocoa Dark Chocolate Bag 123g70% cocoa
vs
Whittaker's Block Dark Almond 200g
Whittaker's Block Dark Almond 200g62% cocoa
Carbohydrate (lower)
29 vs 45.8 g
sugars (lower)
25 vs 32.4 g
More cocoa
70% vs 62%
Energy (lower)
2300 vs 2620 kJ
Protein (higher)
11.4 vs 6.6 g
Fat, total (lower)
35.3 vs 53 g
saturated (lower)
14.6 vs 38 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueLindtWhittaker's
Energy2620 kJ (626 Cal)2300 kJ (550 Cal)
Protein6.6 g11.4 g
Fat, total53 g35.3 g
- saturated38 g14.6 g
Carbohydrate29 g45.8 g
- sugars25 g32.4 g
Dietary fibre-12.75 g
Sodium13 mg16 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each block

Lindt: Cocoa Mass, Sugar, Vegetable Fats, Cocoa Butter, Low Fat Cocoa Powder, Milk Fat, Whole Milk Powder, Emulsifier (Soy Lecithin), Skim Milk Powder, Lactose (Milk),
70% cocoa
Whittaker's: DARK CHOCOLATE COCOA SOLIDS+ 62%* (COCOA MASS+ & COCOA BUTTER+), SUGAR, EMULSIFIER (SOY LECITHIN), VANILLA FLAVOUR; ROASTED ALMONDS 25%. * MINIMUM PERCENTAGE. +
62% cocoa
Browsing Chocolate · rankings · finder · what changed