Cals
Cals › Chocolate › Compare › Coles Hazelnuts vs Lindt Lindor White Chocolate Block 100g

Coles Hazelnuts vs Lindt Lindor White Chocolate Block 100g

Per 100 g, Coles Hazelnuts has less sugar (4.4 vs 42.3), less sodium (3 vs 84), less saturated fat (2.7 vs 37.7) than Lindt Lindor White Chocolate Block 100g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Hazelnuts
Coles HazelnutsColes
vs
Lindt Lindor White Chocolate Block 100g
Lindt Lindor White Chocolate Block 100gLindt
Protein (higher)
14.8 vs 5.2 g
saturated (lower)
2.7 vs 37.7 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
5.1 vs 42.7 g
sugars (lower)
4.4 vs 42.3 g
Sodium (lower)
3 vs 84 mg
Fat, total (lower)
50 vs 61.4 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesLindt
Energy2690 kJ (643 Cal)2670 kJ (638 Cal)
Protein14.8 g5.2 g
Fat, total61.4 g50 g
- saturated2.7 g37.7 g
- monounsaturated48.8 g-
- polyunsaturated7.6 g-
- trans0.2 g-
Carbohydrate5.1 g42.7 g
- sugars4.4 g42.3 g
Dietary fibre10.4 g-
Sodium3 mg84 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each block

Coles: see pack
Lindt: Sugar, cocoa butter, vegetable fats, whole milk powder, skim milk powder, emulsifier (soy lecithin), flavourings.
Browsing Chocolate · rankings · finder · what changed