Cals
CalsChocolateCompareColes Finest Belgian Block Dark Almond vs Ritter Sport Whole Hazelnut Chocolate Block 100g

Coles Finest Belgian Block Dark Almond vs Ritter Sport Whole Hazelnut Chocolate Block 100g

Per 100 g, Coles Finest Belgian Block Dark Almond has less sugar (39.3 vs 43.8), less sodium (10 vs 60), more protein (8.9 vs 8.6) than Ritter Sport Whole Hazelnut Chocolate Block 100g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Finest Belgian Block Dark Almond
Coles Finest Belgian Block Dark AlmondColes Finest
vs
Ritter Sport Whole Hazelnut Chocolate Block 100g
Ritter Sport Whole Hazelnut Chocolate Block 100gRitter Sport
Fat, total (lower)
34.8 vs 38.9 g
sugars (lower)
39.3 vs 43.8 g
Sodium (lower)
10 vs 60 mg
saturated (lower)
15.6 vs 17.3 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
45.8 vs 53.5 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColes FinestRitter Sport
Energy2400 kJ (574 Cal)2397 kJ (573 Cal)
Protein8.9 g8.6 g
Fat, total34.8 g38.9 g
- saturated17.3 g15.6 g
- monounsaturated-14.52 g
- trans0.1 g0 g
Carbohydrate53.5 g45.8 g
- sugars39.3 g43.8 g
Dietary fibre-3.87 g
Sodium10 mg60 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each block

Coles Finest: see pack
Ritter Sport: see pack
Browsing Chocolate · rankings · finder · what changed