Cals › Chocolate › Compare › Coles Chocolate Coated Almonds vs Darrell Lea Double Choc Brownie Milk Chocolate Block 160g
Coles Chocolate Coated Almonds vs Darrell Lea Double Choc Brownie Milk Chocolate Block 160g
Per 100 g, Coles Chocolate Coated Almonds has less sugar (54.6 vs 55.4), less sodium (64 vs 215), less saturated fat (15.2 vs 17.2) than Darrell Lea Double Choc Brownie Milk Chocolate Block 160g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Coles Chocolate Coated AlmondsColes
vs
Darrell Lea Double Choc Brownie Milk Chocolate Block 160gDarrell Lea
Coles Chocolate Coated Almonds leads on
Protein (higher)
7.8 vs 5 g
Fat, total (lower)
26.5 vs 28.9 g
saturated (lower)
15.2 vs 17.2 g
Sodium (lower)
64 vs 215 mg
no measured leads
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Coles | Darrell Lea |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 2170 kJ (519 Cal) | 2170 kJ (519 Cal) |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 5 g |
| Fat, total | 26.5 g | 28.9 g |
| - saturated | 15.2 g | 17.2 g |
| - trans | 0.3 g | - |
| Carbohydrate | 61.5 g | 59.5 g |
| - sugars | 54.6 g | 55.4 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.6 g | - |
| Sodium | 64 mg | 215 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each block
Coles: see pack
Darrell Lea: Milk Chocolate (88%) [Sugar, Milk Solids, Cocoa Butter, Cocoa Mass, Emulsifiers (322 (Soy), 476), Flavours], Brownie Fudge Pieces (6%) [Sugar, Glucose Syrup, Co