Cals
CalsChocolateCompareColes Belgian Dark Chocolate Block vs Darrell Lea Dark Chocolate Block 170g

Coles Belgian Dark Chocolate Block vs Darrell Lea Dark Chocolate Block 170g

Per 100 g, Darrell Lea Dark Chocolate Block 170g has less sugar (49.7 vs 53.1), less sodium (4 vs 47), less saturated fat (17.9 vs 18.4) than Coles Belgian Dark Chocolate Block.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Belgian Dark Chocolate Block
Coles Belgian Dark Chocolate BlockColes
vs
Darrell Lea Dark Chocolate Block 170g
Darrell Lea Dark Chocolate Block 170gDarrell Lea
Protein (higher)
6.8 vs 4.2 g
Energy (lower)
2167 vs 2240 kJ
Carbohydrate (lower)
53.9 vs 59.7 g
sugars (lower)
49.7 vs 53.1 g
Sodium (lower)
4 vs 47 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesDarrell Lea
Energy2240 kJ (535 Cal)2167 kJ (518 Cal)
Protein6.8 g4.2 g
Fat, total29.8 g29.6 g
- saturated18.4 g17.9 g
- trans0.1 g-
Carbohydrate59.7 g53.9 g
- sugars53.1 g49.7 g
Dietary fibre0.9 g-
Sodium47 mg4 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each block

Coles: see pack
Darrell Lea: Sugar, Cocoa Mass, Cocoa Butter, Anhydrous Milk Fat, Emulsifiers (322 (Soy), 476), Natural Flavour, Dark Chocolate contains 47% Cocoa Solids
Browsing Chocolate · rankings · finder · what changed